Solicited Ratings

Responsive Ratings for Dynamic Markets

Firms that want to reduce their cost of capital, increase credit access, or strengthen regulatory applications need a rigorous and independent assessment of their credit risk.

Solicited Ratings

What Distinguishes Our Ratings

01

Our Approach

Our approach improves upon traditional credit risk frameworks. These were designed at a time when data was limited and markets moved slowly. That’s why Silicon Valley Bank carried an investment-grade rating as it failed in 2023. The risks were visible, but the models could not keep up. Unlike traditional approaches, the Agio Ratings approach to assessing credit risk reflects the speed of modern finance.

02

Sensitive to Shifting Conditions

We forecast forward market conditions and reflect their impact on a firm's balance sheet and liquidity. The model can be updated as market conditions change, or new firm data is received.  Our ratings are the product of Bayesian inference where relevant evidence, together with its uncertainty, is distilled into a forward-looking outcome distribution.

03

Anchored in Data

Our approach leverages quantitative models that estimate the future financial performance of a company in a range of scenarios. We deliver the precision that modern risk teams need.

04

Quantitively Rigorous

Our rating is published with a probability of default (PD) and a loss given default (LGD) forecast which can be combined to calculate expected loss (EL).  The time horizons are specific, and outputs are numerical rather than categorial.

“Agio Ratings is deeply knowledgeable about the digital asset market, and the rating process reflects that awareness. Their quantitative approach accelerated conversations with financing partners. It also helped us to make more effective decisions by showing us how different risk mitigants could impact our business.”
John Glover
Chief Investment Officer at Ledn

Get a Rating

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Something went wrong while submitting the form.